Showing 1 - 10 of 406
This paper discusses the implications of learning theory for the analysis of Bayesian games. One goal is to illuminate the issues that arise when modeling situations where players are learning about the distribution of Nature's move as well as learning about the opponents' strategies. A second...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005478817
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408772
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005409128
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005409226
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005409424
In traditional reputation models, the ability to build a reputation is good for the long-run player. In [Ely, J., Valimaki, J., 2003. Bad reputation. NAJ Econ. 4, 2; http://www.najecon.org/v4.htm. Quart. J. Econ. 118 (2003) 785-814], Ely and Valimaki give an example in which reputation is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005413566
In a self-confirming equilibrium, each player correctly forecasts the actions that opponents will take along the equilibrium path, but may be mistaken about the way that opponents would respond to deviations. Intuitively, this equilibrium concept models the possible steady states of a learning...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005466651
In economics, most noncooperative game theory has focused on equilibrium in games, especially Nash equilibrium and its refinements. The traditional explanation for when and why equilibrium arises is that it results from analysis and introspection by the players in a situation where the rules of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004973232
In this paper we consider a number of different ways that a sequence of discrete-time repeated games can approach a continuous-time limit. Our purpose is to clarify the effects of three different factors: 1) The distribution of signals in a fixed discrete-time game, 2) How the distribution (and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004977938
We derive a simplified version of the model of Fudenberg and Levine, 2006 and Fudenberg and Levine, 2011 and show how this approximate model is useful in explaining choice under risk. We show that in the simple case of three outcomes, the model can generate indifference curves that “fan...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011139949