Showing 1 - 10 of 118
We experimentally compare first-price auctions and multilateral negotiations after introducing horizontal product differentiation into a standard procurement setting. The two institutions yield the buyer the same surplus, a difference from prior findings with homogeneous products that results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008556055
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005500027
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005493151
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005499518
type="main" xml:id="ecca12090-abs-0001" <p>We experimentally compare first-price auctions and multilateral negotiations after introducing horizontal product differentiation into a standard procurement setting. Both institutions yield identical surplus for the buyer, a difference from prior findings...</p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011038561
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006750737
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006165123
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006176758
We use the experimental method to compare second-price auctions with 'verifiable' multilateral negotiations in which the sole buyer can credibly reveal to sellers the best price offer he currently holds. Despite the two institutions' seeming equivalence, we find that prices are lower in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005072395
To enhance our understanding of collusion in procurement settings, this paper quantitatively evaluates how the buyer's choice of a reserve price influences the sustainability of two previously devised collusive schemes. If the buyer does not select its reserve price strategically, then collusion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005655436