Showing 1 - 10 of 49
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010134655
We revisit a method used by Das et al. (2007) (DDKS) who jointly test and reject a specification of firm default intensities and the doubly stochastic assumption in intensity models of default. The method relies on a time change result for counting processes. With an almost identical set of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008487919
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008424718
We revisit a test for conditional independence in intensity models of default proposed by Das, Duffie, Kapadia, Saita (2007) (DDKS). Based on a sample of US corporate defaults, they reject the conditional independence assumption but also observe that the test is a joint test of the specification...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012713933
We revisit a method used by Das, Duffie, Kapadia, and Saita (2007) (DDKS) to test the doubly stochastic assumption in intensity models of default. We show that using a different specification of the default intensity, and using the same test as DDKS, we cannot reject using an almost identical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012718522
We revisit a test for conditional independence proposed by Das, Duffie, Kapadia, Saita (2007) (DDKS) applied to US corporate defaults. They reject the conditional independence assumption but also observe that the test is a joint test of the specification of the default intensity of individual...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012724915
We present a new estimation approach that allows us to extract from spreads in synthetic credit markets the contribution of systematic and idiosyncratic default risk to total default risk. Using an extensive dataset of 90,600 credit default swap and collateralized debt obligation (CDO) tranche...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010970329
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010976040
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010976082
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010953653