Showing 1 - 10 of 91
Affirmative-action policies bias tournament rules in order to provide equal opportunities to a group of competitors who have a disadvantage they cannot be held responsible for. Critics argue that they distort incentives, resulting in lower individual performance, and that the selected pool of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010547484
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010086982
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002216604
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002216606
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002216613
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003552316
We report experimental results on a series of ten one-shot two-person 3x3 normal form games with unique equilibrium in pure strategies played by non-economists. In contrast to previous experiments in which game theory predictions fail dramatically, a majority of actions taken coincided with the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005413513
In contrast to the simplifying assumption of selfishness, social incentives have been shown to play a role in economic interactions. Before incorporating social incentives into models and policies, however, one needs to know their efficiency relative to standard pay-for-performance incentives....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010851328
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjects choose between a selfish action, a costly surplus creating action (altruistic behavior) and a costly surplus destroying action (spiteful behavior). While costly surplus creating actions are most frequent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010851352
We study optimal contracts in a simple model where employees are averse to inequity as modelled by Fehr and Schmidt (1999). A selfish employer can profitably exploit envy or guilt by offering contracts which create inequity off-equilibrium, i.e., when employees do not meet his demands. Such...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010851475