Showing 1 - 10 of 70
We examine a sample of 375 filings of connected transactions between Hong Kong listed companies and their controlling shareholders during 1998-2000. We address three questions: What types of connected transactions are likely to lead to expropriation of minority shareholders? Which firms are more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012783838
We examine a sample of 328 filings of quot;connected transactionsquot; between Hong Kong listed companies and their controlling shareholders during 1998-2000. We address three questions: What types of connected transactions are likely to lead to expropriation of minority shareholders? Which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012721248
We analyze related party transactions between Chinese publicly listed firms and their state-owned enterprise (SOEs) shareholders to examine whether companies benefit from the presence of government shareholders and politically connected directors appointed by the government. We find that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012721832
We examine a sample of 254 related party and arms' length acquisitions and sales of assets in Hong Kong during 1998-2000. Our analysis shows that publicly listed firms enter deals with related parties at unfavorable prices compared to similar arms' length deals. Firms acquire assets from related...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012722860
We examine a sample of 254 related party and arms' length acquisitions and sales of assets in Hong Kong during 1998-2000. Our analysis shows that publicly listed firms enter deals with related parties at unfavourable prices compared to similar arms' length deals. Firms acquire assets from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012754972
We examine a sample of related party transactions between Chinese publicly listed firms and their controlling shareholders during 2001-2002. Minority shareholders in these firms seem to be subject to expropriation through tunneling but also gain from propping up. On balance, there is more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012755023
This paper uses a methodology robust to recent criticisms of standard long-horizon event study tests to show that bidders in mergers underperform while bidders in tender offers overperform in the three years after the acquisition. However, the long-term underperformance of acquiring firms in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012787788
Extant literature on the post acquisition performance of bidders in mergers and tender offers is divided as to whether or not the bidders underperform in the long-term after the acquisition. In addition, standard long-horizon tests used for testing this underperformance have been shown to be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012788445
We examine whether mutual funds change their names to take advantage of current hot investment styles, and what effects these name changes have on inflows to the funds, and to the funds' subsequent returns. We find that the year after a fund changes its name to reflect a current hot style, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012785088
This paper investigates the determinants of the market share of investment banks acting as advisors in mergers and tender offers. In both mergers and tender offers, bank market share is positively related to the contingent fee payments charged by the bank and to the percentage of deals completed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012785279