Showing 1 - 10 of 22
Intensive agriculture is often bad for wildlife. Does this imply that a goal to boost wildlife on agricultural land is best met through a general reduction in intensity? We argue that such an approach may not be optimal, since cost functions for provision of wildlife on agricultural land may be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010987550
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006428327
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005743673
We introduce uncertainty about farmer characteristics into the moral hazard problem facing a regulator offering agri-environmental contracts. Our model allows for a continuum of farmer compliance costs. For reasonable parameter values the model predicts high levels of cheating and intensive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005743708
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005721965
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005336794
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005349119
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005293613
How do technology spillovers affect the relationship between emissions taxes and technological change? Without spillovers, a regulator applies Pigovian taxes which lead to a first-best optimum (optimal emissions and optimal technology investment). Given spillovers, Pigovian taxes are likely to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005239577
Directed technological change concerns how stocks of factor-augmenting knowledge evolve relative to each other. In a simple framework we show that relative investment rates depend directly on the relative factor shares, and that the resulting evolution of the economy depends on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010586133