Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Some researchers have argued that anchoring in economic valuations casts doubt on the assumption of consistent and stable preferences. We present new evidence that questions the robustness of certain anchoring results. We then present a theoretical framework that provides insights into why we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011133322
We derive a simplified version of the model of Fudenberg and Levine, 2006 and Fudenberg and Levine, 2011 and show how this approximate model is useful in explaining choice under risk. We show that in the simple case of three outcomes, the model can generate indifference curves that “fan...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011139949
Some researchers have argued that anchoring in economic valuations casts doubt on the assumption of consistent and stable preferences. We present new evidence that questions the robustness of certain anchoring results. We then present a theoretical framework that provides insights into why we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011154551
Some researchers have argued that anchoring in economic valuations casts doubt on the assumption of consistent and stable preferences. We present new evidence that explores the strength of certain anchoring results. We then present a theoretical framework that provides insights into why we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010815734
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010819801
In this paper we reply to Mitesh Kataria’s comment, which criticized the simulations of Maniadis, Tufano, and List (2014, Am. Econ. Rev. 104(1), 277-290). We view these simulations as a means to illustrating the fact that we economists are unaware of the value of key variables that determine...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010735666
We reexamine the effects of the anchoring manipulation of Ariely, Loewenstein, and Prelec (2003) on the evaluation of common market goods and find very weak anchoring effects. We perform the same manipulation on the evaluation of binary lotteries, and find no anchoring effects at all. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010859225
We derive a simplified version of the model of Fudenberg and Levine [2006, 2011] and show how this approximate model is useful in explaining choice under risk. We show that in the simple case of three outcomes, the model can generate indifference curves that “fan out” in the Marshack-Machina...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011027334
We model aggregate information release, in a dynamic setting with random matching, as a conscious, preference-driven choice. We introduce a “planner”, who possesses and selectively reveals aggregate information. Aggregate information is gathered slowly, by taking small samples from the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011151101
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004999616