Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show “Deal or No Deal” and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011348343
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011477281
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011295909
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009655243
Experiments frequently use a random incentive system (RIS), where only tasks that are randomly selected at the end of the experiment are for real. The most common type pays every subject one out of her multiple tasks (within-subjects randomization). Recently, another type has become popular,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014219012
This paper examines how risk behavior in the limelight differs from that in anonymity. In two separate experiments we find that subjects are more risk averse in the limelight. However, risky choices are similarly path dependent in the different treatments. Under both limelight and anonymous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013008121
Decision-makers show an increased risk appetite when they gamble with previously won money, the house money effect, and when they have a chance to make up for a prior loss, the break even effect. To explore the origins of these effects, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging to record the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013060053
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003755353