Showing 1 - 8 of 8
In this paper they argue that cancelling the debt of the poorest countries was a good thing, but that it should not imply that the debt instrument should be foregone. Debt and debt cancellations are indeed two complementary instruments which, if properly managed, perform better than either loans...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008739767
In this paper we examine whether absorptive capacity can constitute sufficient justification for rejecting the proposal of a large aid increase to support the ‘big push’. We argue that the probability of a poverty trap exists for many countries, in particular the least developed countries...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010323520
We argue in this paper that cancelling the debt of the poorest countries was a good thing, but that it should not imply that the debt instrument should be foregone. Debt and debt cancellations are indeed two complementary instruments which, if properly managed, perform better than either loans...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005031760
We argue in this paper that cancelling the debt of the poorest countries was a good thing, but that it should not imply that the debt instrument should be foregone. We claim that debt and debt cancellations are indeed two complementary instruments which, if properly managed, perform better than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005656217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005613622
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003664155
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003413759
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003629041