Showing 1 - 10 of 15
We characterize pension systems along three dimensions: 1) actuarial vs. non-actuarial, 2) funded vs. pay-as-you-go, 3) defined-contribution vs. defined-benefit. Increasing the degree of actuarial fairness, by strengthening the linkage between contributions and benefits, reduces labor market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010320156
This paper considers the possibility of letting a pay-go pension system mimic a fully funded pension system. Generically, it turns out to be impossible to make a less than fully funded pension system actuarially fair on average. But a non-funded pay-go pension system can provide an actuarially...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010334940
This paper presents a unified analytical framework for the analysis of social security reform. It discusses reform along two dimensions: Pay-As-You-Go versus fully funded on the one hand, and actuarial versus non-actuarial on the other. Making the system more actuarial entails a trade-off...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010335015
The paper discusses the consequences for the functioning of different pension systems of various types of socioeconomic changes, mainly demographic developments, variations in productivity growth and changes in real interest rates. Two of the pension systems have exogenous and four have...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010335128
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000987021
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001775286
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001672615
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001707296
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001630117
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001510198