Showing 1 - 10 of 14
On 21 July 2005 China adopted an undisclosed basket exchange rate regime. We formally assess and envisage the gradual …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264340
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003334975
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003796632
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003674399
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003571244
In light of the recent tit-for-tat trade dispute between China and the US, interest in quantifying the effects of the … China and the US, trade diversion effects are also analyzed. The model-based analysis finds noticeable positive (negative …) impacts of the agreement for the US (China) as well as negative spillover effects for countries not directly affected by the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012819425
In light of the recent tit-for-tat trade dispute between China and the US, interest in quantifying the effects of the … for China and the US, trade diversion effects are also analyzed. The model-based analysis finds noticeable positive … (negative) impacts of the agreement for the US (China) as well as negative spillover effects for countries not directly affected …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013239330
On 21 July 2005 China adopted an undisclosed basket exchange rate regime. We formally assess and envisage the gradual …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012753619
In light of the recent tit-for-tat trade dispute between China and the US, interest in quantifying the effects of the … for China and the US, trade diversion effects are also analyzed. The model-based analysis finds noticeable positive … (negative) impacts of the agreement for the US (China) as well as negative spillover effects for countries not directly affected …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012486660
On 21 July 2005 China adopted an undisclosed basket exchange rate regime. We formally assess and envisage the gradual …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014222900