Showing 1 - 10 of 29
The major focus of this paper is introducing an objectives clause in patent statutes. Such proposals have been made in Australia as it is clear from case law that judges need better direction as to the goals of the patent system. An advisory group, composed largely of patent system...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013030744
The inventive step is the critical variable in determining balance between patent costs and patent benefits. Set at the right level it ensures that the knowledge spillovers from new inventions offset the costs of restraining competition. But asking the question "is it obvious?" sets a far lower...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014162618
Drawing on case law and the results of an empirical study, this paper demonstrates that the height of the inventive step in Australia is close to zero and substantially different from the "significant advance over what is known" advised to the Australian parliament in 2011. To "raise" the height...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014162674
Despite advice to parliament that patents are granted only for "a significant advance over what was known and what was available to the public" the evidence shows this is not the standard used. The actual standard is a scintilla – a marginal difference from what is known. The consequence of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014140376
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010415308
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011736217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000735323
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012237891
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010338937
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001644595