Showing 1 - 10 of 10
There is no agreement regarding the growth-enhancing effects of financial liberalization, mainly because it is associated with risky international bank flows, lending booms, and crises. In this paper we make the case for liberalization despite the occurrence of crises. We show that in developing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011402501
Mexico, a prominent liberalizer, failed to attain stellar gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the 1990s, and since 2001 its GDP and exports have stagnated. In this paper we argue that the lack of spectacular growth in Mexico cannot be blamed on either the North American Free Trade Agreement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011402509
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002086233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002095412
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002095422
Mexico, a prominent liberalizer, failed to attain stellar gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the 1990s, and since 2001 its GDP and exports have stagnated. In this paper we argue that the lack of spectacular growth in Mexico cannot be blamed on either the North American Free Trade Agreement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002017640
There is no agreement regarding the growth-enhancing effects of financial liberalization, mainly because it is associated with risky international bank flows, lending booms, and crises. In this paper we make the case for liberalization despite the occurrence of crises. We show that in developing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002017675
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002020349
"Mexico, a prominent liberalizer, failed to attain stellar gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the 1990s, and since 2001 its GDP and exports have stagnated. In this paper we argue that the lack of spectacular growth in Mexico cannot be blamed on either the North American Free Trade Agreement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001928157
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001928189