Showing 1 - 10 of 72
CEOs are “lucky” when they receive stock option grants on days when the stock price is the lowest in the month of the grant, implying opportunistic timing. Extending the work of Bebchuk, Grinstein, Peyer (2010), we explore the effect of overall corporate governance quality on CEO luck....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013080819
We examine the impact of social capital at the US county level on managerial risk-taking incentives. We hypothesize that corporate executives in counties with higher social capital would accept lower equity-based compensation then faithfully behave in terms of efforts and risks following the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013403614
Grounded in agency theory, this paper investigates the effect of board independence on managerial ownership. We exploit the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the associated exchange listing requirements as an exogenous regulatory shock that raises board independence. Our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012942295
probability of executive removal, managers are less likely to be removed and are more motivated to make long-term investments. Our …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012995867
CEOs are “lucky” when they are granted stock options on days when the stock price is lowest in the month of the grant, implying opportunistic timing and severe agency problems (Bebchuck, Grinstein, and Peyer, 2010). Using idiosyncratic volatility as our measure of stock price...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013072852
.98%-32.43%. Motivated by managerial risk aversion, managers are in favor of lower customer concentration, resulting in a sub-optimal level …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014236545
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014225815
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012939829
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012939841
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014429892