Showing 1 - 10 of 2,253
The Kuznets-Kaldor stylized facts are one of the most striking empirical regularities of the development process in industrialized countries: While massive factor reallocation across technologically distinct sectors takes place, the aggregate ratios of the economy are quite stable. This implies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015230933
This paper finds that the steady-state direction of technological progress is determined by the relative size of factor supply elasticities and the returns to scale of the production function, which have so far been ignored. However, the relative price (Hicks, 1932) and relative market size...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015255745
The celebrated Uzawa(1961) theorem holds that,on the steady-growth path of neoclassical growth model,technological progress must be purely labor-augmenting rather than capital-augmenting,except the special case where the production function takes the form of Cobb-Douglas. With an augmented...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015241978
Since the publication of Uzawa(1961), it has been widely accepted that technical change must be purely labor-augmenting for a growth model to exhibit steady-state path. But in this paper, we argue that such a constraint is unnecessary. Further, our model shows that, as long as the sum of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015241979
Taking into account the adjustment costs of investment, this paper proves that it is not the neoclassical growth model itself but the specific form of capital accumulation function that requires technical change to exclusively be Harrod neutral in steady state. Uzawa’s(1961)steady-state growth...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015241980
Based on a general growth model, this paper finds that the steady-state direction of technological progress is determined by the scale return of the production function and the relative factor supply elasticities. A specific version of that model extends Acemoglu (2002) to provide the underlying...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015265384
I update the Greenwood, Hercowitz, and Krusell (1997) decomposition of U.S. growth into contributions from neutral and investment-specific technological progress. I allow the decomposition to vary across sub-samples, reflecting the presence of trend breaks in the data. The estimates suggest that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015267518
The history of modern economic growth indicates that technical change is not only purely labor-augmenting, but also skill biased the 20th century. Although there are papers that have separately analyzed why technical change be purely labor-augmenting or skill biased, there is no paper analyzing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015270915
Technological progress relates not only to its rate but also to its direction and bias. The rate has been analyzed by the endogenous technical change models and the bias has been analyzed by the directed technical change model, but the determinants of the direction has not been uncovered yet....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015271006
This paper introduces long waves into Pasinetti's model of structural change on the assumption that productivity growth is fundamentally driven by technological revolutions (radical process and product innovations). The argument is developed at the logical stage of the "natural" system,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015217804