Showing 1 - 10 of 10
The neoclassical consumer maximizes utility and makes choices by completely preordering the feasible alternatives and weighing when indifferent. The consumer studied in this paper chooses by weighing when indifferent and also when indecisive, without necessarily preordering the alternatives or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015219093
This paper proposes and characterises two preference-based choice rules that allow the decision maker to choose nothing if the criteria associated with them are satisfied by no feasible alternative. Strict preferences are primitive in the first rule and weak preferences in the second. Each of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015223438
This paper proposes a model of individual choice that does not assume completeness of the decision maker's preferences. The model helps explain in a natural way, and within a unied framework of choice in the presence of preference-incomparable options, three distinct behavioural phenomena: the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015232972
Three reasons why decision makers may defer choice are *indecisiveness* between feasible options, *unattractiveness* of these options and *choice overload*. This paper provides a choice-theoretic explanation for each of these phenomena by means of three deferral-permissive models of decision...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015249452
This paper studies a decision maker who chooses monetary bets/investment portfolios under pure uncertainty. Necessary and sufficient conditions on his preferences over these objects are provided for his choice behavior to be guided by the *maxmin expected value* rule, and therefore to exhibit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015249923
This paper studies a decision maker who chooses monetary bets/investment portfolios under pure uncertainty. Necessary and sufficient conditions on his preferences over these objects are provided for his choice behavior to be guided by the *maxmin expected value* rule, and therefore to exhibit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015250021
A large body of experimental work has suggested the existence of a "choice overload" effect in consumer decision making: Faced with large menus of choice options, decision makers often defer or avoid choice. A suggested reason for the occurrence of this effect is that the agents attempt to avoid...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015250124
A large body of experimental work has suggested the existence of a "choice overload" effect in consumer decision making: Faced with large menus of choice options, decision makers often defer or avoid choice. A suggested reason for the occurrence of this effect is that the agents attempt to avoid...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015253863
A large body of empirical work has suggested the existence of a "choice overload" effect in consumer decision making: When faced with large menus of alternatives, decision makers often avoid/indefinitely defer choice. A suggested reason for the occurrence of this effect is that the agents try to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015253864
Three reasons why decision makers may defer choice are *indecisiveness* between various feasible options, *unattractiveness* of these options, and *choice overload*. This paper provides a choice-theoretic explanation for each of these phenomena by means of three deferral-permitting models of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015252827