Showing 1 - 10 of 114
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001780952
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002851571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003761353
In its landmark ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois in 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court restricted standing to sue for recovery of antitrust damages to direct purchasers. However, antitrust damages are typically (in part) passed on to intermediaries lower in the chain of production and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011343268
In its landmark ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, the U.S. Supreme Court restricted standing to sue for recovery of damages suffered from a breach of federal antitrust law to direct purchasers only. Even though typically antitrust injury is, at least in part, passed on to firms lower in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014064647
One of the lessons of US private antitrust enforcement is that limitations on the rights of the defendant and the plaintiffs' standing to sue should not be imposed lightly. Three Supreme Court decisions in Hanover Shoe, Illinois Brick and ARC America have resulted in a complex and unwieldy...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014058187
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001500735
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001465683
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001231507
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001685790