We investigate experimentally how decisions in the Dictator Game are affected by cognitive manipulations aimed at promoting greater reliance on deliberation. Specifically, we run an online experiment where we have 6 distinct experimental conditions resulting from the combination of 2 conditions...

In this paper we investigate the effect of moral suasion on ingroup favouritism. We report a well-powered, pre-registered, two-stage 2x2 mixed-design experiment. In the first stage, groups are formed on the basis of how participants answer to a set of questions, concerning non-morally relevant...

In this paper, we analyze the role of intuitive versus deliberative thinking in stag hunt games. To do so we, first, provide a conceptual framework predicting that, under the assumption that stag is the ruling social convention in real life interactions, players who make their choices fast and...

We study the long-run evolutionary outcome emerging when two populations of agents play the demand game with three (or a few) possible splits, with the two populations differing in the sample sizes used when best responding to retrieved information from the past. We focus on the relation between...

We study the evolution of conventions in a coordination game where: (i) agents choose a location to interact locally, (ii) interactions are sometimes global and sometimes local, and (iii) agents can be either fine or coarse reasoners, i.e., agents are able or not, respectively, to distinguish...

We take an evolutionary perspective to explore the implications of different relationships between power and initiation of conflicts (i.e., conflict initiation function) for the long-run distribution of power between groups. So far, attention has focused on how the role played by the...