Showing 1 - 10 of 90
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009786519
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003992810
We revisit a test for conditional independence in intensity models of default proposed by Das, Duffie, Kapadia, Saita (2007) (DDKS). Based on a sample of US corporate defaults, they reject the conditional independence assumption but also observe that the test is a joint test of the specification...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012713933
We revisit a method used by Das, Duffie, Kapadia, and Saita (2007) (DDKS) to test the doubly stochastic assumption in intensity models of default. We show that using a different specification of the default intensity, and using the same test as DDKS, we cannot reject using an almost identical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012718522
We revisit a test for conditional independence proposed by Das, Duffie, Kapadia, Saita (2007) (DDKS) applied to US corporate defaults. They reject the conditional independence assumption but also observe that the test is a joint test of the specification of the default intensity of individual...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012724915
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013463403
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011785093
The Basel II/III and CRD-IV Accords reduce capital charges on bank loans to smaller firms by assuming that the default probabilities of smaller firms are less sensitive to macroeconomic cycles. We test this assumption in a default intensity framework using a large sample of bank loans to private...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014124273
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011436014
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009540542