Showing 1 - 10 of 711
We examine potential selective reporting in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less likely to be reported...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010429931
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011342390
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011564893
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011379952
We examine potential selective reporting (publication bias) in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013018028
We examine potential selective reporting in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less likely to be reported...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013025396
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009616291
One of the most frequently examined statistical relationships in energy economics has been the price elasticity of gasoline demand. We conduct a quantitative survey of the estimates of elasticity reported for various countries around the world. Our meta-analysis indicates that the literature...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008908934
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009313667
Meta-analysis upweights studies reporting lower standard errors and hence more precision. But in empirical practice, notably in observational research, precision is not given to the researcher. Precision must be estimated, and thus can be p-hacked to achieve statistical significance. Simulations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013555608