Showing 1 - 10 of 24
This paper considers general bargaining outcomes under coalition structures formed by an external patent holder and firms in oligopoly markets. The main propositions are as follows. For each coalition structure, the kernel is a singleton; thus, the number of licensees that maximizes the patent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013055203
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009305628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010237475
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014440829
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013277163
O'donoghue and Zweimüller (2004, J. of Econ. Growth), a seminal work, showed that broadening leading breadth in patent protection can stimulate innovation. However, the empirical literature has consistently found skeptical results on the positive effect. To fill the gap, we build another...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014233354
O'donoghue and Zweimuller (2004, J. of Econ. Growth), a seminal work, showed that broadening leading breadth in patent protection can stimulate innovation. However, the empirical literature has consistently found skeptical results on the positive effect. To fill the gap, we build another...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014345217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009537984
We consider stable licensing schemes that are combinations of lump-sum fee and per-unit royalty realized as bargaining outcomes in transferring a new technology from a technology holder to oligopolistic firms through licensing. The licensing schemes on which the technology holder and licensees...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012944814
In this paper, we consider a Cournot duopoly market in which the patent‐holding firm negotiates with its rival firm about payments for licensing a cost‐reducing innovation. Applying the Nash bargaining solution, we compare two licensing policies, a fixed fee and a royalty. Our results are as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014170999