Showing 1 - 10 of 193
In recent years divergence between United States ("US") and European Union ("EU") competition policy has garnered a lot of attention. One particular area where these differences are evident is the treatment of vertical restraints. In the USA, an antitrust plaintiff must show that a vertical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014028141
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003121048
The legality of nonprice vertical practices in the U.S. is determined by their likely competitive effects. An optimal enforcement rule combines evidence with theory to update prior beliefs, and specifies a decision that minimizes the expected loss. Because the welfare effects of vertical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014028121
The legality of nonprice vertical practices in the U.S. is determined by their likely competitive effects. An optimal enforcement rule combines evidence with theory to update prior beliefs, and specifies a decision that minimizes the expected loss. Because the welfare effects of vertical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014028139
As a general proposition, antitrust law is hostile to price discrimination. This hostility appears to derive from a comparison of perfect competition (with no price discrimination) to monopoly (with price discrimination). Importantly, economists have known for some time that some forms of price...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014143761
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001666240
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003224870
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001663577
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002026063
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014438883