Showing 1 - 10 of 30
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009404758
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009505942
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009509443
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009511057
This paper identifies two distinctive features of ancient constitutional design that have largely disappeared from the modern world: constitution-making by single individuals and constitution-making by foreigners. We consider the virtues and vices of these features, and argue that under...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014186729
In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (2007), the Supreme Court held, among other things, that the EPA has statutory authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, and that the agency cannot decline to do so on political grounds. We analyze the logic of MA v. EPA...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014212540
Chevron, U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council lays out a two-step process that courts must follow when they review a federal agency's construction of a federal statute. We argue that Chevron, rightly understood, has only one step. The single question is whether the agency's construction...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014215237
What is collective wisdom, and how can institutions be designed to generate and exploit it? This essay argues for a reductionist conception of collective wisdom as collective epistemic accuracy, and cashes out that conception at the level of institutional design. Assuming that the social goal is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014215275
Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014220915
In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (2007), the Supreme Court held, among other things, that the EPA has statutory authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, and that the agency cannot decline to do so on political grounds. We analyze the logic of MA v. EPA...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014224276