Showing 1 - 10 of 19
This paper deploys a novel experiment to compare four theories that explain both selfish and non-selfish cooperation. The four theories capture incomplete information (à la Kreps et al. (1982)) alongside the following four non-selfish motives: caring about others (Altruism), being conscientious...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013368347
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013283878
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011992574
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011781650
In prosocial decisions, decision-makers are inherently uncertain about how their decisions impact others' utility - we call this interpersonal uncertainty. We show that people's response to interpersonal uncertainty shapes well-known patterns of prosocial behavior. First, using standard social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014578386
Rational agents must perform backwards induction by thinking contingently about future states and actions, but failures of backwards induction and contingent reasoning are ubiquitous. How do boundedly-rational agents make decisions when they fail to correctly forecast actions in the future? We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013361987
This paper introduces and studies the Network Dilemma, which embeds a social dilemma within a network formation game. The game models the voluntary provision of a costly public good that is locally non-excludable within an endogenously formed network of agents. In this environment, all...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012860030
Present bias is the inclination to prefer a smaller present reward to a larger later reward, but reversing this preference when both rewards are equally delayed. Such behavior violates stationarity of temporal choices, and hence exponential discounting. This paper provides a weakening of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012860567
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012168835
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012595679