Showing 1 - 10 of 4,868
We show that competing downstream firms may rather invest in their inefficient inhouse production than help improve the technology of the efficient supplier, even if this is costless. Even worse, a downstream firm can have strong incentives to decrease the efficiency of the supplier in order to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011789508
We study the incentives of firms that hold partial vertical ownership to foreclose rivals. Compared to a full vertical merger, with partial ownership, a firm may obtain only part of the target's profit but may nevertheless be able to influence the target's strategy significantly. The target may...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013385143
Entry deterrence can occur when downstream incumbents hold non-controlling ownership shares of a supplier which is commited to charge uniform prices to all downstream firms. The ownership shares imply a rebate on the input price for the incumbents through the profit participation. Such backward...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011649478
information, which drives innovation and welfare. Private incentives, however, lead to information asymmetries resulting in market … implementation in order to achieve innovation-friendly and competitive digital markets. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013361957
and merchants that allow the collection of profiling information which drives innovation and welfare. Private incentives …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014469335
We analyze the effects of downstream firms' acquisition of pure cash flow rights in an efficient upstream supplier when all firms compete in prices. With an acquisition, downstream firms internalize the effects of their actions on their rivals' sales. Double marginalization is enhanced. Whereas...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010308299
We examine cost-reducing investment in vertically-related oligopolies, where firms may be vertically integrated or separated. Analyzing a standard linear Cournot model, we show that: (i) Integrated firms invest more than separated competitors. (ii) Vertical integration increases own investment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010315492
We examine vertical backward integration in a reducedform model of successive oligopolies. Our key findings are: (i) There may be asymmetric equilibria where some firms integrate and others remain separated, even if firms are symmetric initially; (ii) Efficient firms are more likely to integrate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010315532
We show how temporary ownership by private equity firms affects industry structure, competition and welfare. Temporary ownership leads to strong investment incentives because equilibrium resale prices are determined by buyers incentives to block rivals from obtaining assets. These incentives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010318810
Theory shows that vertical integration has contrasting two effects, efficiency and foreclosure effects. This study empirically estimates the relative size of these two effects. Unlike previous studies, I focus on a single vertical merger in order to use a panel dataset, and estimate its average...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010332229