Showing 1 - 10 of 296
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005622278
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809239
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596411
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005752981
When there is incomplete information on the source of power in a contest, the contestants may divide their lobbying efforts between the potential centers of power, only one of which determines the contests’ winning probabilities. Our analysis focuses on the effect of ambiguity regarding the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005708975
This paper presents a new model of interest groups and policy formation in the legislature. In our setting, the already given party ideological predispositions and power distribution determine the expected policy outcome. Our analysis applies to the case of un-enforced or enforced party...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010634426
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005674687
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005396892
The main drawback of the public-policy contest is that the notion of contest success function, a crucial component of the contest model, does not have micro-foundations and, therefore, the random behavior of the government seems ad-hoc. In the present paper we propose a partial micro-foundation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005405886
The compromise enhancing effect of lobbying on public policy has been established in two typical settings. In the first, lobbies are assumed to act as 'principals' and the setters of the policy (the candidates in a Downsian electoral competition or the elected policy maker in a citizen-...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005405940