Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Auditing standards direct auditors to consider business risk and other risk factors when they evaluate the overall risk of material misstatement during the planning phase of an audit. Large audit firms generally use either a strategic-systems approach (SSA) or a transaction-focused approach...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008499114
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005317083
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005219848
Audit judgement research has widely assumed that auditors rely primarily on backward reasoning during analytical procedures but the relative use of forward reasoning has not been directly examined. The present study explains how auditors use backward and forward reasoning during analytical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005157807
This study examines whether auditors from different countries come to different conclusions when they perform analytical procedures to assess the risk of misstatement in accounts. During a laboratory experiment, auditors who worked for the same firm in the United Kingdom, France, and the United...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008866435
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of performance feedback and client importance on auditors' self- and public-focused ethical judgments. Design/methodology/approach – An experiment is conducted in which 71 auditors are assigned to one of four conditions created...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009350123