Showing 1 - 10 of 179
This paper argues that the theory of action proposed by Hume in the Treatise does not imply that individuals are rational in the sense of modern choice theory. An individual's behaviour is non-rational if his/her choices systematically contravene the consistency axioms of the theory, and if the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005505345
Since homo sapiens is a social animal, one might expect human nature - the set of psychological propensities with which our species is naturally endowed - to equip human beings to live in social groups. In this chapter, we consider the implications of this idea for economics and game theory. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005520889
The random preference, Fechner (or "white noise"), and constant error (or "tremble") models of stochastic choice under risk are compared. Various combinations of these approaches are used with expected utility and rank-dependent theory. The resulting models are estimated in a random effects...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005542707
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005485812
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005485844
The discovered preference hypothesis appears to insulate expected utility theory (EU) from disconfirming experimental evidence. It asserts that individuals have coherent underlying preferences, which experiments may not reveal unless subjects have adequate opportunities and incentives to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005496150
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369365
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005392955
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005393072
This paper defines the concept of a justifiable strategy, that of a justification theory (which shows strategies to be justifiable) and that of a complete justification theory (which for every strategy shows whether it is justifiable or not). An impossibility result is proved, showing that there...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005393277