Showing 1 - 10 of 285
occurs under flexible legal regimes.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011081130
We build a stylized model of endogenous technological change and analyze the relationship between legal institutions, innovation and growth. Two legal systems are analyzed: a rigid system, where an uncontingent law is written ex ante (before knowing the current technology) and a flexible system...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008557295
We analyze the relationship between legal institutions, innovation and growth. We compare a rigid (law set ex-ante) legal system and a flexible one (law set after observing current technology). The flexible system dominates in terms of welfare, amount of innovation and output growth at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009148877
We analyze the relationship between legal institutions, innovation and growth. We compare a rigid (law set ex-ante) legal system and a flexible one (law set after observing current technology). The flexible system dominates in terms of welfare, amount of innovation and output growth at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009150639
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010682784
We analyze the relationship between legal institutions, innovation and growth. We compare a rigid (law set ex-ante) legal system and a exible one (law set after observing current technology). The exible system dominates in terms of welfare, amount of innovation and output growth at intermediate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010706824
We embed a simple contracting model with ex-ante investments in which there is scope for Court intervention in a full-blown open-ended dynamic setting. The underlying preferences of both Courts and contracting parties are fully forward looking and unbiased. Our point of departure is instead the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010746104
regime is superior in more slow-changing ones (e.g. inheritance law).
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011082093
All Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are sunk. This can generate a time-inconsistency problem. From an ex-ante perspective, Courts will have the ex-post temptation to be excessively lenient. This observation is at the root of the rule of precedent, known as stare decisis. <P>...</p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011004637
In a Case Law regime Courts have more flexibility than in a Statute Law regime. Since Statutes are inevitably incomplete, this confers an advantage to the Case Law regime over the Statute Law one. However, all Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are already taken. Therefore, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005013908