Showing 1 - 10 of 176
In a model with finitely many agents who have single-dipped Euclidean preferences on a disc in the Euclidean plane, a rule assigns to each profile of reported dips a point of the disc. It is proved that any strategy-proof and Pareto optimal rule is dictatorial. This framework models situations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041815
In a model with finitely many agents who have single-dipped Euclidean preferences on a polytope in the Euclidean plane, a rule assigns to each profile of reported dips a point of the polytope. A point <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$$x$$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"> <math xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <mi>x</mi> </math> </EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of the polytope is called single-best if there is a point <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$$y$$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"> <math xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <mi>y</mi> </math> </EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of the...</equationsource></equationsource></inlineequation></equationsource></equationsource></inlineequation>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010993556
In this paper we characterize strategy-proof voting schemes on Euclidean spaces. A voting scheme is strategy-proof whenever it is optimal for every agent to report his best alternative. Here the individual preferences underlying these best choices are separable and quadratic. It turns out that a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596425
We consider the problem of reallocating the total initial endowments of an infinitely divisible commodity among agents with single-peaked preferences. With the uniform reallocation rule we propose a solution which satisfies many appealing properties, describing the effect of population and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005304836
Under a k-approval scoring rule each agent attaches a score of one to his k most preferred alternatives and zero to the other alternatives. The rule assigns the set of alternatives with maximal score. Agents may extend preferences to sets in several ways: they may compare the worst alternatives,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005510313
This paper is concerned with the number of profiles at which a nondictatorial social choice function is manipulable. For three or more alternatives the lower bound is derived when the social choice function is nondictatorial and unanimous. In the case of three alternatives the lower bound is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005510318
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369380
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005375574
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005409271
Gibbard''s (1973) and Satterthwaite''s (1975) result implies that anonymous surjective social choice functions on more than two alternatives are manipulable. Placing some mild constraints on the number of agents compared to the number of alternatives, we show what the minimal number of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011165153