Showing 1 - 10 of 141
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010581400
Several recent studies in experimental economics have tried to measure beliefs of subjects engaged in strategic games with other subjects. Using data from one such study we conduct an experiment where our experienced subjects observe early rounds of strategy choices from that study and are given...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005005854
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005654714
We investigate theoretically and experimentally the <italic>crisis bargaining</italic> model, a dynamic game of two-sided incomplete information with player types drawn from a commonly known distribution. Little work has been done to analyze whether and how players update their beliefs in such games.Within the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010990846
In experiments, people do not always appear to think very strategically or to infer the information of others from their choices. To understand this thinking process further, we use "Mousetracking" to record which game payoffs subjects look at, for how long, in games of private information with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008567802
Non-incentivized belief elicitation has a negative effect on the belief accuracy of experienced observers predicting choices in 2 x 2 matrix games. This negative impact extends to the accuracy of group beliefs and revised beliefs after forecasters know each other's initial beliefs.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008866984
To understand the thinking process in private information games, we use “Mousetracking†to record which payoffs subjects attend to. The games have three information states and vary in strategic complexity. Subjects consistently deviate from Nash equilibrium choices and often fail to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011277908
We analyze a game of two-sided private information characterized by extreme adverse selection, and study a special case in the laboratory. Each player has a privately known "strength" and can decide to fight or compromise. If either chooses to fight, there is a conflict; the stronger player...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005537375
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005482028
We present experimental results on individual decisions in juries. We consider the effect of three treatment variables: the size of the jury (three or six), the number of votes needed for conviction (majority or unanimity), and jury deliberation. We find evidence of strategic voting under the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005482033