Showing 1 - 10 of 1,552
This note reconsiders some of the issues raised by Kadane and Larkey, and Harsanyi, and briefly discusses some relevant empirical results.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009191801
The normative solution concepts of game theory try to provide a clear mathematical characterization of what it means to act rationally in a game where all players expect each other to act rationally. Kadane and Larkey reject the use of these normative solution concepts. Yet, this amounts to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009198096
This paper explores some of the consequences of adopting a modern subjective view of probability for game theory. The consequences are substantial. The subjective view of probability clarifies the important distinction between normative and positive theorizing about behavior in games, a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009214552
Larkey. Management Sci. 28 124--125.) on the relative usefulness of game theory and decision theory for analyzing decisions …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009218039
the epistemic notions of unawareness and knowledge, we try to build a bridge between decision theory and epistemic logic …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008914729
the epistemic notions of unawareness and knowledge, we try to build a bridge between decision theory and epistemic logic …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009004843
choices can be excluded on the basis of a decision maker's v. Neumann-Morgenstern utility function, her knowledge of past … observations, and the assumption of Bayesian rationality. Since no betting strategy is irrational, Bayesianism is useless as a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010956859
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010535645
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009318953
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009318954