Showing 1 - 10 of 25
Three experiments tested if individuals show violations of transitivity in choices between risky gambles in linked designs. The binary gambles varied in the probability to win the higher (better) prize, the value of the higher prize, and the value of the lower prize. Each design varied two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010575514
This experiment tested two behavioral properties of risky decision making--gain-loss separability (GLS) and coalescing. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) implies both properties, but the transfer of attention exchange (TAX) model violates both. Original prospect theory satisfies GLS but may or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009208767
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005431111
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005109341
Recently proposed models of risky choice imply systematic violations of transitivity of preference. Five studies explored whether people show patterns of intransitivity predicted by four descriptive models. To distinguish ?true? violations from those produced by ?error,? a model was fit in which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005082856
Recent research reported evidence that contradicts cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic. The same body of research also violates two editing principles of original prospect theory: cancellation (the principle that people delete any attribute that is the same in both alternatives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005612483
Previous tests of cumulative prospect theory (CPT) and of the priority heuristic (PH) found evidence contradicting these two models of risky decision making. However, those tests were criticized because they had characteristics that might ``trigger'' use of other heuristics. This paper presents...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005828368
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005348372
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005348396
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005348440