Showing 1 - 10 of 152
One of the biggest criticisms leveled at defined contribution individual account (IA) components of social security systems is that they are too expensive. This paper investigates the cost-effectiveness of three options for constructing funded social security pillars: 1) IA's invested in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005777478
What is the most cost-effective way to organize individual accounts that are part of a mandatory social security system? Defined-contribution individual account components of social security systems are criticized for being too expensive. The authors investigate the cost-effectiveness of two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005030562
One of the main criticisms of the defined-contribution, individual-account components of social security systems is that they are too expensive. The authors investigate the cost-effectiveness of three options for constructing funded social security pillars: * Individual accounts invested in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005128741
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005660377
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005793730
Pension reforms normally focus on the accumulation phase, plus term insurance that provides bnefits for the disabled and for dependent survivors, all of which are immediate concerns. Decumulation of the capital in workers'retirement savings accounts appears to be far in the future. But in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005133511
Most countries reforming their pension system, focus more on the accumulation phase, than on the decumulation (pay-out), because the number of beneficiaries is likely to be small initially, especially if older workers are discouraged from joining the new system. Policymakers place a priority on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005115959
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005156703
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010695697
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010703841