Showing 1 - 10 of 19
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001448263
This article investigates the impact that successful hostile and friendly takeovers have on the rates of top management change for U.K. target firms. The results shows that hostile takeovers are associated with a greater degree of both top executive and top team forced departure rates compared...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013004215
This paper uses a multinomial framework to develop several takeover prediction models. The motivation for this approach lies with Morck, Shleifer and Vishny (1988), who note that separate considerations are appropriate for predicting which firms are subject to hostile (disciplinary) and friendly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013004375
We show that minority acquisitions are more common for targets in countries with worse information environments. The effect is stronger for diversifying acquisitions, deals for high-tech targets, and when the bidder has prior acquisition experience. Minority acquisitions can also be a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012902992
The market for corporate control is generally regarded as an important disciplinary mechanism in well developed economies. Entrenchment mechanisms commonly used by US firms in the form of anti-takeover provisions (ATPs) may offer some protection from disciplinary action, facilitating...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013116334
This paper examines the relationship between firm size, sovereign governance, and value-creation in acquisitions. The takeover literature suggests that size can enable managerial entrenchment and value-destruction. However, in weak governance environments, size might have off-setting benefits,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013068491
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009666660
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010382654
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003554356
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003203827