Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011578325
"Spending on M&A has, in aggregate, grown so fast that it has even overtaken capital expenditure on increasing and maintaining physical assets. Yet McKinsey, the leading management consultancy, reports that "Anyone who has researched merger success rates knows that roughly 70% fail". The idea...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012165863
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013182303
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011957553
The accounting literature has found evidence that acquirers in stock-for-stock M&A have typically managed earnings upwards ahead of a bid. Other literatures have concluded that, when stock prices are high and rising, M&A is higher, more M&A is financed with stock, market sentiment and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012911666
This paper discusses the use of M&A to facilitate earnings management. The accounting procedures we analyse variously create earnings which would not be reported in the absence of M&A; or reduce reported earnings; or shift earnings between accounting periods. The motivation for deploying the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012835992
Meeks and Meeks (2022, MM for short)* has a question in its subtitle, Why spend ever more on mergers when so many fail? There are three interwoven strands in the book’s answer:First, contracts (explicit and implicit) often reward key players in the M&A market — executives and advisers —...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014254188