This paper revisits the staggered board debate focusing on the long-term association of firm value with changes in board structure. We find no evidence that staggered board changes are negatively related to firm value. However, we find a positive relation for firms engaged in innovation and...

This online appendix provides additional results as described in our paper "Staggered Boards and Long-Term Value, Revisited", available at 'http://ssrn.com/abstract=2364165' http://ssrn.com/abstract=2364165

In his novel contribution to the ongoing debate over executive compensation, Share Repurchases, Equity Issuances, and the Optimal Design of Executive Pay, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 1113 (2011), Professor Jesse M. Fried points to a problem that has been, as of yet, unexplored by legal scholars. He argues...

The primacy of the principal-agent model of corporate governance is largely undisputed in the existing law and economics literature. Contrary to the prevailing opinion, this Article contends that the bilateral agency paradigm fails to accurately describe the incentive problems arising in the...

This article examines the mechanisms used by venture capitalists (VCs) to monitor their investments in startups that use trade secrets to protect their intellectual property (IP). First, we confirm that, after startups are afforded stronger trade secrets protection by the adoption of the Uniform...

We examine the effect of board members with venture capital experience (i.e., VC directors) on executive incentives at non-VC-backed public firms. VC directors serving on the compensation committee are associated with greater CEO risk-taking incentives (i.e., vega) and pay-for-performance...

We examine the effect of board members with venture capital experience (i.e., VC directors) on executive incentives at publicly listed firms. VC directors serving on the compensation committee are associated with greater CEO risk-taking incentives (i.e., vega) and greater pay-for-performance...