Showing 1 - 10 of 39
We estimate the deterrence effects of European Commission (EC) merger policy instruments over the 1990-2009 period. Our empirical results suggest that phase-1 remedies uniquely generate robust deterrence as – unlike phase-1 withdrawals, phase-2 remedies, and preventions – phase-1 remedies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011392122
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011409046
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011878231
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010219914
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009722705
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011308759
We formulate a simple model of optimal defensive disclosure by a dominant firm facing uncertain antitrust enforcement and test its implications using unique data on defensive disclosures and patents by IBM. Our results indicate that stronger antitrust enforcement leads to more defensive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014165176
We estimate the deterrence effects of U.S. merger policy instruments with respect to the composition and frequency of future merger notifications. Data from the Annual Reports by the U.S. DOJ and FTC allow industry based measures over the 1986-1999 period of the conditional probabilities for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013122386
We show that the number of merger proposals (frequency-based deterrence) is a more appropriate indicator of underlying changes in merger policy than the relative anti-competitiveness of merger proposals (composition-based deterrence). This has strong implications for the empirical analysis of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013155108
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003906997