Showing 1 - 10 of 50
This brief explains amici's understanding of the relevant economic analysis. It explains why basic economic principles underlying the analysis of multi-sided markets lead to the conclusion that a plaintiff should be required to demonstrate, at a minimum, that: (1) the allegedly unlawful...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849293
Since the original Pitofsky hearings, much has fundamentally changed in the way the firms do businesses. Yet, despite these rapid and fundamental shifts in technology and behavior, we still face many of the same policy challenges as existed twenty years ago (and more). Innovation always yields...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012871004
For years, regulators and competition watchdogs have expressed concern about competition in the digital advertising business. They note that digital advertising appears to be dominated by a few dominant firms, such as Google, Facebook, and—to a lesser extent—Amazon. Some claim that this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014345024
Robert Bork's Antitrust Paradox (1978) has been justification for lack of antitrust behavior for over four decades. His test essentially asks if consumers are harmed by the pricing practices of the firm in the market in which they purchase the good or service. Even if these firms are monopoly or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012804859
A substantial literature on multisided markets – markets with multiple distinct groups of consumers who care about the extent of participation of other groups in the market – has developed over the past decade. This literature has not given substantial consideration to a critical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014176904
Antitrust has long been treated as exceptional by the courts. This article argues that the Supreme Court is moving away from this exceptionalist treatment of antitrust, and is working to bring antitrust within a normalized administrative law jurisprudence. That is, we are moving into an era of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013049002
The Supreme Court's 2018 opinion in American Express v. Ohio is among the most important – and divisive – antitrust opinions in the modern era of antitrust law. The simplest statement of Justice Thomas's opinion for the majority is that it saw a 5 Justice majority of the Court fully embrace...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012867174
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000557716
We employ a Cournot model with interdependent demands to explore the interaction between demand and cost complementarities in mitigating upward pricing pressure, post-merger. The analysis reveals that even substantial increases in the HHI post-merger need not raise competitive concerns when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012840112