Showing 1 - 10 of 27
We follow the labor market outcomes of applicants who were randomized into job training a year and a half before the pandemic through the subsequent economic turmoil that resulted from COVID-19. Despite persistently improved labor market outcomes of training participants prior to March 2020, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012794593
We follow the labor market outcomes of applicants who were randomized into job training a year and a half before the pandemic through the subsequent economic turmoil that resulted from COVID-19. Despite persistently improved labor market outcomes of training participants prior to March 2020, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013311604
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002041573
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001462407
In this paper, we present a matching model with adverse selection that explains why flows into and out of unemployment are much lower in Europe compared to North America, while employment-to-employment flows are similar in the two continents. In the model, firms use discretion in terms of whom...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001483257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002110231
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001854482
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001955286
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001838252
In this paper, we present a matching model with adverse selection that explains why flows into and out of unemployment are much lower in Europe compared to North America, while employment-to-employment flows are similar in the two continents. In the model, firms use discretion in terms of whom...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014161382