Showing 1 - 10 of 14
This paper show analytically that introducing diminishing returns to labor at the firm level into the Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides model, followed by recalibration, does not change aggregate dynamics of unemployment and vacancies. This invariance result holds for several standard calibration...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012510772
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014472406
This paper show analytically that introducing diminishing returns to labor at the firm level into the Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides model, followed by recalibration, does not change aggregate dynamics of unemployment and vacancies. This invariance result holds for several standard calibration...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013230065
We document in the Survey of Income and Program Participation covering 1990- 2013 that a surprisingly large share of workers return to their previous employer after a jobless spell and experience very different unemployment and employment outcomes than job switchers. The probability of recall is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012947117
Using data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) covering 1990-2011, we document that a surprisingly large number of workers return to their previous employer after a jobless spell and experience more favorable labor market outcomes than job switchers. Over 40% of all...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013072873
Using data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) covering 1990-2011, we document that a surprisingly large number of workers return to their previous employer after a jobless spell and experience more favorable labor market outcomes than job switchers. Over 40% of all...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013059869
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009710992
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010345048
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008748272
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010221228