Showing 1 - 10 of 38
We study a capital market in which multiple lenders sequentially attempt at financing a single borrower under moral hazard. We show that restricting lenders to post take-it-or-leave-it offers involves a severe loss of generality: none of the equilibrium outcomes arising in this scenario survives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012952465
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012266261
We study an economy where intermediaries compete over contracts in a nonexclusive insurance market affected by moral hazard. Our setting is the same as that developed in Bisin and Guaitoli [2004]. The present note provides a counterexample to Proposition 2, 3 and 4 in Bisin and Guaitoli [2004]...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014055217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001645407
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003338577
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001340350
We consider multiple-principal multiple-agent games of incomplete information. In this context, we identify a class of direct and incentive compatible mechanisms: each principal privately recommends to each agent to reveal her private information to the other principals, and each agent behaves...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014180095
We consider an exchange economy in which a seller can trade an endowment of a divisible good whose quality she privately knows. Buyers compete in menus of non-exclusive contracts, so that the seller may choose to trade with several buyers. In this context, we show that an equilibrium always...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014199733
This note presents a counter-example to Theorems 3 and 4 in Peters (2003, J. Eco. Theory) and suggests that indifference of the single agent with respect to principals' offers plays an important role in the failure of the Revelation Principle in Common Agency games. In addition we provide a new...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014027080
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003983805