Showing 1 - 10 of 17
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010356820
We propose a signaling model in which the central bank and firms receive information on cost-push shocks independently from each other. If the firms’ signals are rather unlikely to be informative, central banks should remain silent about their own private signals. If, however, firms are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008746680
We introduce the notion of verifiable information into a model of sequential debate among experts who are motivated by career concerns. We show that self-censorship may hamper the efficiency of information aggregation, as experts withhold evidence contradicting the conventional wisdom. In this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008748176
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008905039
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009424158
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003800579
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011792169
We introduce the notion of verifiable information into a model of sequential debate among experts who are motivated by career concerns. We show that self-censorship may hamper the efficiency of information aggregation, as experts withhold evidence contradicting the conventional wisdom. In this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014195375
In this paper we examine whether publishing the information underlying the central bank's decisions is socially desirable. We show that opacity may lead to the same equilibrium as transparency. However, additional equilibria may emerge under opacity with adverse consequences for welfare....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013147417
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009723769