Showing 1 - 10 of 13
We investigate experimentally how the menstrual cycle affects bargaining behavior and bargaining outcomes of women. Female participants negotiate in an unstructured bilateral bargaining game with asymmetric information about the allocation of a surplus ('pie size'). We find that the menstrual...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014472533
We investigate experimentally how the menstrual cycle affects bargaining behavior and bargaining outcomes of women. Female participants negotiate in an unstructured bilateral bargaining game with asymmetric information about the allocation of a surplus ('pie size'). We find that the menstrual...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014464113
We investigate experimentally how the menstrual cycle affects bargaining behavior and bargaining outcomes of women. Female participants negotiate in an unstructured bilateral bargaining game with asymmetric information about the allocation of a surplus ('pie size'). We find that the menstrual...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014469147
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014484418
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001747348
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011590702
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011872374
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011458521
In the context of supply function competition with private information, we test in the laboratory whether, as predicted in Bayesian equilibrium, costs that are positively correlated lead to steeper supply functions and less competitive outcomes than do uncorrelated costs. We find that the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012982452
In the context of supply function competition with private information, we test in the laboratory whether — as predicted in Bayesian equilibrium — costs that are positively correlated lead to steeper supply functions and less competitive outcomes than do uncorrelated costs. We find that the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012854395