Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Within-group communication in competitive coordination games has been shown to increase competition between groups and lower efficiency. This study further explores potentially harmful effects of communication, by addressing the questions of (i) asymmetric communication and (ii) the endogenous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970700
Traders' values and information typically consist of both private and common-value elements. In such environments, full allocative efficiency is impossible when the private rate of information substitution differs from the social rate (Jehiel and Moldovanu, 2001). We link this impossibility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013106787
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009783271
Charness and Dufwenberg (American Economic Review, June 2011, 1211-1237) have recently demonstrated that cheap-talk communication raises efficiency in bilateral contracting situations with adverse selection. We replicate their finding and check its robustness by introducing competition between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009742591
Traders' values and information typically consist of both private and common-value elements. In such environments, full allocative efficiency is impossible when the private rate of information substitution differs from the social rate (Jehiel and Moldovanu, 2001). We link this impossibility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009742606
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010411533
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010470200
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010528943
Costless pre-play communication has been shown to effectively facilitate within-group coordination. However, in competitive coordination games, such as rent-seeking contests, better within-group coordination leads to more aggressive competition and lower efficiency. We report an experiment in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013029381
We examine behavior in a three-player trust game in which the first player may invest in the second and the second may invest in the third. Any amount sent from one player to the next is tripled. The third player decides the final allocation among three players. The baseline treatment with no...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013096059