Showing 1 - 10 of 56
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001697922
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003089846
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002976370
How do neoclassical economists reply to Austrian critiques of their work? Typically, although to be sure there are exceptions, they ignore them. That is, the former move mountains in an effort to avoid the arguments of the latter. Sometimes this occurs even when neoclassicals explicitly reply to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014179500
Cowen (1997) criticizes Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT) on eight grounds: 1. systematic errors; 2. inflation volatility; 3. confusion of inflation and savings; 4. confusion of inflation and investment; 5. real vs. nominal rates of interest; 6. interest rate information; 7. investor...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014180372
The triangle is an integral part of the history of economic thought. It has been used by writers such as Jevons (1871), Taussig (1896), Wicksell (1934, 1969) to illustrate and to help us understand capital theory. Since Hayek (1931) this geometrical figure has been used as a basic pedagogical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014180373
Jeffrey Rogers Hummel criticizes Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT), and it is our intent in the present article to reply to his criticisms, defending this viewpoint against the difficulties he raises with it. Hummel sees six separate problems with the Austrian or praxeological analysis of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014180376
Barnett and Block (2008) establish that not only are fractional reserve demand deposits fraudulent and create an Austrian Business Cycle (ABC), but that a certain type of mismatching between time deposits and the period for which the depository institution re-lends the deposited funds (banks or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013122789
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003970908
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009162277