Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We study how institutional investors utilize potentially biased information by analyzing the effect of IPO underwriters' earnings forecasts on investors' bidding behaviors in Chinese IPO auctions. Despite the presence of upward biases in underwriters' earnings forecasts, we nd that investors'...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013222466
Using a large proprietary IPO bidding dataset from China, we examine whether there is information production in auctioned IPOs in which uniform price applies and the underwriter has no allocation discretion. Our IPO-level and IPO-bidder-level analyses suggest that institutions bid in IPO...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012893827
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011391737
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012172862
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013363603
It is widely accepted that quid pro quo or favoritism exists in bookbuilding IPOs where the securities underwriter has share allocation discretion, and that auctioned IPOs should be largely free from quid pro quo because the underwriter does not have share allocation discretion. Using...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015411677
Is there quid pro quo in auctioned IPOs - an alternative to bookbuilding in U.S. and elsewhere? Using proprietary data on uniform-pricing IPO auctions from China, we show when the share allocation rule shifted from pro rata to lottery draw (that makes quid pro quo valuable to a bidder), fund...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013242394
There is quid pro quo in auctioned IPOs. Using proprietary data on uniform-pricing IPO auctions, we show when the share allocation rule shifted from pro rata to lottery draw, fund families having pre-shift stronger brokerage commission ties with the underwriter submit bids later, place more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013292752