Showing 1 - 10 of 25
We examine the relationship between IPO underpricing and litigation risk in an international setting using a sample of 13,759 firms that went public across 40 countries between 1991 and 2011. While the majority of single-country studies do not find support for the lawsuit avoidance hypothesis,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013096114
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003890195
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009756949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010472565
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011722262
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015393897
This study examines whether IPO disclosure requirements mandated by countries' securities laws are associated with variation in IPO underpricing in international IPO markets. Our empirical analysis uses a unique sample of 6,025 IPOs from 34 countries over the period from 1995 to 2002. We show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013112428
We consider the importance of legal opportunism as an explanation for observed litigation following a large sample of initial public offerings (IPOs). We characterize legal opportunism as litigation based on the potential to recover losses after negative stock price developments rather than the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012937864
We examine whether underwriters have an information advantage over other institutional investors in new public companies. We focus our attention on a sample of publicly traded firms that have become the target of an IPO-related securities class action lawsuit filed under Section 11 of the 1933...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013063314
We examine how the ownership of lead venture capital firms (VCs) evolves after their portfolio companies (PCs) are publicly listed. The VC investment period before the IPO, the VC age, the PC age, and the percentage change in the post-IPO stock price all incentivize earlier VC exit. Lead VCs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013308073