Showing 1 - 4 of 4
Issuers increasingly employ advisory firms (e.g. Moelis, Rothschild) to select underwriters, negotiate spreads and provide oversight during IPOs. We examine whether such advisers affect underpricing. Concealed within weak aggregate effects, we find significant heterogeneity amongst adviser...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012848985
The literature on IPO allocations assumes that investors bid their true demand in bookbuilding, or alternatively that all orders are uniformly inflated. We propose a model in which investors face uncertainty with respect to the aftermarket performance of the IPO and the number of shares they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013306073
The literature on IPO allocations assumes that investors bid their true demand in bookbuilding, or alternatively that all orders are uniformly inflated. We propose a model in which investors face uncertainty with respect to the aftermarket performance of the IPO and the number of shares they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013405061
Firms increasingly appoint independent advisers in IPOs alongside underwriters. We explore why, and we formulate a selection model. Controlling for issuer-adviser matching, we find advisers in aggregate have no effect on first-day returns, withdrawals, or fees paid to underwriters. However,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014352503