Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014380489
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010222930
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010222922
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003802952
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011870287
In this study, we examine whether government regulatory initiatives in China involving IPO by SOEs may have contributed to opportunistic behaviors by the issuer. We focus on two sets of IPO regulations issued between January 1, 1996 and February 11, 1999: pricing regulations, which stipulate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013080892
Audit firms become politically connected when their partners are appointed to the regulatory committee that screens prospective initial public offering (IPO) companies. Connections with regulators may enable audit firms to gain insights into the regulatory process which can help their clients...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014170166
We examine the consequences of shifting the IPO offer pricing power from securities regulators to market participants in a representative weak investor protection country, China. We show IPO offer prices relative to reported earnings are less depressed when determined by market participants than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013006100
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010369812
We examine investment banks' strategic entry and market share gain in the new China H-share IPO (HIPO) market since 1993. Investment banks would have the incentive in initial years to obtain the HIPO business by low balling, i.e., providing high offer prices to the issuer, leading to a lower...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013131963